Tag Archives: politics

Finding Worthy Voices

Leave a reply

It’s hard these days to find news worthy of reading. Modern media is so focused on getting clicks and attracting attention that objectivity is lost, and with it, my desire to pay attention. Outrageous headlines, the sharing of blatant lies, and shared sources spouting the same news with different faces in different regions, does not make for an informed audience.

So where are people getting there news from? Who are the people that provide insights, and thoughtful dialogue? Who actually does the research and gathers data and information from reliable sources?

I’ve recently started reading a Canadian political writer (and former student) Darcy McNeil, ‘From the Northern Front’ on Substack.

Who else are people reading these days?

Getting Political

Leave a reply

My background: As an educator I mostly kept my political views private/non-partisan, and would often share the importance of voting in a democracy. I say mostly because if I saw something egregious, I have felt obligated to speak up.

I’m retired now and feel like it’s time to share more about me and my personal perspective.

I am a left of center centrist. I have never voted Conservative. I have voted Liberal, but before Mark Carney, every time I voted Liberal it was a strategic vote to ensure the Conservative in our constituency did not get in. Mark Carney as leader of the Liberal party was the first time I voted Liberal, by choice, not as a strategic vote. (For my American friends, we don’t vote for our Prime Minister unless we live in his/her political riding.)

Also note: Carney is not liberal. If you look at his political strategies and approach he is conservative, and the most conservative politician I’ve ever supported. As a centrist, it was bound to happen at some time, but I’m happy to see a conservative ruler like him in power.

The world today: The American empire is falling. For my entire life I have seen the President of the United States as the ruler of the free/Western world. He has been a representative of what it means to live in a democracy with the promise of liberty, the opportunity for equality, and the potential for upward mobility… In a free world. This might never have been true, it might only ever have been a facade, but it is glaringly not the case today. You cannot be a Superpower when you punish your allies, and spew propaganda and lies, while stifling the once free media. You can note divide your population in hard times when unity is needed.

Meanwhile in Canada: With the exception of some Alberta conservatives, who have been influenced by American politics (and propaganda), Canada has never been more united. Make no mistake, times are going to get tough after the failure of US trade talks, and painful tariffs are imposed, but real Canadians understand that a trade deal can not include allowing foreign control over our sovereignty. So people of every political party and stance have united in agreement with Carney walking away from the negotiations.

The new leader: I did not think of this myself, I’ve heard it framed a few different ways in the last couple days… Mark Carney is now the leader of the free/Western world. He took his first step down this path when he spoke at Davos. I shared back then,

“Prime Minister Mark Carney’s speechat The World Economic Summit in Davos was a call to action, an invite for a band of brothers to take action.”

His idea of the ‘middle powers’ uniting to carve a future out that benefited everyone was the first step. But until Canada stepped away from the trade negotiations this weekend, no middle power truly defied the unrealistic demands of the US. Now Mark Carney and Canada has shown that it is possible to stand up to the bully. And before doing so Carney not only set up some significant bilateral trade agreements with other middle powers, he has also paved the way to develop far more agreements.

Make no mistake, if you want to know who is ensuring the continuation of the values of a free/Western world, look no further than Mark Carney.

All that said: I’d still love to see a workable agreement between Canada and the US. The world is a better place if the US is part of the agreements going forward. And this would benefit both countries greatly. I believe the USA is a country in crisis… and I would like nothing better than to see the people of America, especially the ones most in need, get more support. This won’t happen with an unreliable leader who can’t be trusted to keep agreements, and who egregiously alters the truth to meet his delusional world view… while calling every other perspective ‘fake news’.

The way forward: Despite calling Mark Carney ‘the leader of the free/Western world’, the way forward now is not for him to wield power, but to wield influence. Other countries must now stand up against US bullying behaviour, and show a united front of leadership through open alliances. Canada has led the way. The question now is if other countries will follow?

Inevitable threat

Leave a reply

I said this in March, 2024:

“We are less than a decade away from one intelligent crackpot, working in his or her (more likely an incel ‘his’) basement lab, creating or recreating a deadly virus and having it spread covid-19 style across the globe…

The greatest threat to mankind isn’t wealthy people, politicians, and powerful countries, it’s one individual with malice in his heart and access to knowledge, and information, and more power than anyone should ever have.

And I just read this:

“In January 2026, Bill Gates wrote in his annual letter. He didn’t describe the next pandemic as a distant possibility or a risk to be modeled. He said a non-government group using open-source AI tools to design a bioterrorism weapon was not just possible – it was, in his word, coming.” ~ Raven Fon

And just a few days ago:

“AI CEOs from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Microsoft set aside their rivalry to warn Congress AI is making it too easy to design and create bioweapons” ~ Marco Quiroz-Gutierrez

The greatest threat of AI may not be that AI takes over the world, the greatest threat is that it empowers individuals with bad intentions to have significant negative impact and influence over the rest of the world. What we most need to fear is not some sort of revenge of the robots, but rather the loner who hates the world and is empowered by AI to wreak havoc at a scale that is impossible today, but very possible in the near future.

The challenge in dealing with this really serious threat is that as AI intelligence increases, the prevention and defence of the threat will always be chasing the ease with which the threat can be realized. In other words, the threat will will grow faster than the mechanism we design to safeguard against the threats.

Legislation will help, but will it be enough?

Lacking decorum

Leave a reply

I used to think, ‘I don’t understand how we got here?’ But I’m beginning to see a pattern.

Honour, respect, and decency are conventions. They are merely expectations, they are simply the way things are normally done in a caring culture. Decorum is upheld not by the roles of everyone, rather it is upheld by the usual lack of tolerance for people that don’t show decency. A key role for those with power and influence in a decent society is to demonstrate what’s acceptable, and when they don’t, conventions are not enough.

Conventions, decency , and decorum are expectations, not laws. To break them is not illegal, but rather just ugly. And sad.

Our collective tolerance has been too weak. The ‘paradox of intolerance’ is the problem on two fronts. First, in being too tolerant of the intolerant. But secondly and almost more importantly, because the tolerant are held to a higher standard. Those who hold decorum and decency within them expect of themselves to follow these conventions, and are upset but more tolerant of those who do not, in comparison to the expectations they place on themselves.

It’s a slippery slope because bad faith actors are given too much leeway to say and share things unbecoming of themselves and the roles they play in society. And so it takes a lot less effort to lack decency and decorum than it does to uphold it.

Agency, not information

Leave a reply

One of my favourite quotes comes from Derek Sivers,

“If more information was the answer, then we’d all be billionaires with perfect abs.“

I was reminded of this in a video shared with me yesterday morning, “Can Paper Stop Tyrants?“. In it the vlogger, Tad Stoermer, shares:

“Too many people are still talking as if words act on their own; As if law acts on its own; As if constitutions act on their own; As if conventions just magically act on their own. They don’t, people act…”

He sees the futility in people waiting for action against tyranny… which simply is not coming. Then he continues with something he was told by European literary scholar, Dr. Julia Holloway:

“Evil continues when people convince themselves that stopping it is somebody else’s job… What is missing in our time is not information, it’s agency. It’s the capacity to see suffering as real, and then understand that action is required. Her point was that a culture that devalues the humanities also devalues the habits of empathy and moral imagination that make action possible.”

We seem to live in an era of outrage, whereby there is some expectation that outrage itself is action. “Can you believe this is happening?” is not a statement that prevents something from happening at that point, or in the future. Yet, that seems to be the stance most people hold.

Outrage without action is a loud but impotent form of acceptance. 

It holds no agency, and does not promote change. When conventions are broken, it’s easy to be upset, but conventions are only conventions because good people hold them up as such… and it’s that ‘holding them up’ that just isn’t happening.

_______

*Update: I read this by Chris Williamson after posting, and it seems too fitting with this post not to share:

“The gap between words and actions has never been bigger.

You can be the least virtuous, meanest, most dishonest human on earth, but if you say the right things on social media, the world will be unaware.

No one stress tests the words coming out of most people’s mouths.

Which means that appearing good becomes more important than being good.

Performative empathy is more rewarded than genuine empathy.

Posting about mistreated groups is more incentivised than helping mistreated groups.

Words have become more important than actions, because you can tweet the words without needing to do the actions.

It’s the path of least resistance for everyone.

This isn’t me saying that you can’t do good whilst posting about it online.

But that many (maybe even most?) of the people who proselytise about how virtuous and caring they are, and how it’s everyone else who is evil/malignant/the enemy, are allowing their morality to stand on the shoulders of limited scrutiny.

Beware the people who only say good things, but don’t do good things.“

​

In living satire

Leave a reply

A few years back I heard someone say that we are living in the timeline that is the laughing stock of all other timelines, and I’m routinely reminded of this.

I read a quote from the leader of the most powerful nation in the world today, shared in a social media post commenting on it, and my BS detector went off. This had to be fake… satire to anger those not intelligent enough to get the joke! So I went onto the web version of this man’s social media propaganda machine that bears the word ‘Truth’, (again this screams satire), to see if the quote actually came from the horse’s mouth.

It did.

He actually said this ridiculous statement. I know what you want to ask. I know I’m being too vague, and you are wondering, ‘What did he say this time?’ But here’s the sad truth: I could have written this a week ago, a month ago, a year ago… the only thing that would be different is the quote itself. Not the fact that it’s so obtuse that it is offensive. Not that it’s a disgrace to the office he holds. Not that it’s so off colour that you’d think it was satire if you didn’t read it at its source.

So here we are in living satire. Living in a joke of a timeline, where we can’t distinguish the difference between the truth and what is satirical, fake news shared on ‘The Onion’. And here I am writing a post that will be just as relevant a week, month, or year farther into our comical, if not sad timeline.

Intentionally disconnected

1 Reply

Is it just me that has been intentionally disconnecting from the news and even social media around the war in the Middle East?

I truly understand my privilege in saying this, since I don’t have loved ones in jeopardy. And understand the desire of some people to know what’s going on because there are global ramifications. Yet I find myself unable to concern myself with the political posturing, the doublespeak, the justifications, and the outrage. I feel like I don’t have the mental capacity to either partially engage and feel insignificantly informed or to delve in and be fully informed… and ultimately powerless to do more than fill my brain with visions of destruction and violence.

Even though I usually choose to ignore the negativity of news, I still tend to keep myself updated on global issues and major news stories, but I’m struggling to engage right now. I find it too disheartening.

It makes me question the humanity of humans. That as a species we can construct such diametrically opposed ideologies; that we can live in societies that value greed over the welfare of the community; that we can choose leaders who do not care for the people that elected them into ‘service’… these are things I don’t understand. Or rather, things I don’t want to believe that humans could value more than peace, love, and kindness.

And so for now I lack the capacity to engage. It seems like a futile activity that will anger and upset me, with no gain. It is rare for me to actively choose to be uninformed, but right now is one of those times.

Keeping the faith

2 Replies

Religions around the world are losing followers. But people are seekers, they want to believe in something. And while there are downsides to religion, including fanaticism and blind following of misguided faith leaders, there is also a warmth of community, a comfort of shared values, and a wonderful sense of belonging.

Atheism and often the path it can lead to nihilism don’t fill the voids a loss of religion can leave behind. And I think that’s why we see blind faith emerging that doesn’t seem to make sense to many.

Why on earth would someone in 2026 join a community of flat earthers who have to literally ignore volumes of data in order to believe what they believe? Maybe because the community is so inviting to anyone who believes?

Why would someone defend unnecessary violence, or even terrorism in the name of God or country? Maybe because they feel othered, or fear being othered. Maybe they feel hurt and seek vengeance? Maybe they feel the government is too heavy-handed or not heavy handed enough?

Why would someone follow a leader who does things they would previously have been upset about? Maybe there is one pillar that leader stands on that supports their beliefs more than any other transgression that leader might be accused of? Maybe they feel community, shared values, and a sense of belonging are all missing in their lives because their waning beliefs in a broken religion can no longer fulfill these needs.

When people can’t seem to hold onto their religious faith, where else do they put their faith?

It seems today that it goes to all the wrong places.

We need a new kind of religion, one that is inherent in most faiths already, but often masked by evangelical fervour, threats of secularism, misinterpreted scripture, literal interpretations of metaphors, among other reasons justifiable by the keepers of the faith. That inherent idea common to all faiths, the somehow lost idea, is that we are all the children of God, and that we should be kind, caring, and even loving to all God’s children.

If that was the underlying premise of ‘our belief systems’ (intentionally plural) then the best thing we could do is to keep the faith. But when religions and more specifically religious people, focus on differences, and when charismatic leaders decide that hate, separation, and false prophecies are the goal, well then our belief systems rise only to crumble.

This is the path we are on, not an increase in atheism, because atheism is not a belief system to swap another religion for. A thing to ‘not believing in’ is not a replacement for a faith. And so what we are seeing is a rise in people looking in all the wrong place to feel safe and then blindly, misguidedly keeping the faith.

From comedy to sad reality

Leave a reply

I first saw it as a joke on TikTok, African content creators making comedic posts about sponsoring needy children in America. I got the humour, Americans not being able to afford healthcare is a serious concern. After growing up seeing ‘sponsor a child’ ads on TV I can remember my parents putting a picture of a kid we sponsored, to help feed and educate her, on our fridge… to see this same sort of thing about a kid in America is clever satire.

Today that satire came to life. Sitting in a hotel room, watching an American movie television station with my wife, we saw an ad with a bald little boy being featured. A voiceover of his mom shared how hard it was to have her child diagnosed with cancer. Then the true purpose of this ad came to life, this was an American hospital asking for monthly pledges to change a young kid’s life. This is no longer comedy, it’s pure tragedy. An American hospital is asking for $19 a month to change the life of a young American child.

It’s no longer a comedic bit… This is the reality we live in today.

The moment I’ve been waiting for

1 Reply

I wanted it, but I didn’t think it was going to happen. Last February I wrote ‘Schoolyard rules’ and basically said that unlike in the movies, in the real world the bully usually wins.

I ended that post saying,

“If we want to see the feel good movie ending, it won’t be one hero protagonist saving the day. No it will be the band of brothers all standing up to the schoolyard bully. It will be all the kids in the schoolyard saying, ‘That’s enough!” It will be his own little gang deciding that he’s not worth supporting. It didn’t happen the first time around, maybe it will happen this time… but I’m not betting on it. I’m looking around the school yard and I just don’t see enough kids banding together, and I definitely don’t see enough adult supervision.”

Prime Minister Mark Carney’s speech at The World Economic Summit in Davos was a call to action, an invite for a band of brothers to take action. The only question now is if we get the movie ending or if the moment is lost in cowardice… and the bully still wins.

I’m hopeful.